← back to the board
[[46,30,3]] d =
n
46
k
30
d
3
kd²/n
5.86957
w
23
X/Z
1
g
0.007
r
5.3852
layers
2
swaps
23

Share this result

Distance

X/Z asymmetry 1 · d_X = 3, d_Z = 3 · w_X = 23, w_Z = 23 (max(d_X,d_Z)/min(d_X,d_Z); each side carries its own earned tier: = certified exact, ≤ witness upper bound)
d_X 3 · witness weight 3 (claimed upper_bound)
witness found by @mathys · research/kit/surrogate.lightest_logical · found at 1000 trials · survived 1000 trials · 2026-11-01
witness operator (support, 3 qubits)
[4, 31, 33]
d_Z 3 · witness weight 3 (claimed upper_bound)
witness found by @mathys · research/kit/surrogate.lightest_logical · found at 1000 trials · survived 1000 trials · 2026-11-01
witness operator (support, 3 qubits)
[5, 18, 19]
certificate exact, d = 3 · CryptoMiniSat 5.14 SAT · level proof_log: the refutation was re-checked by drat-trim and is replayed by CI
X: no logical < 3 exists; Z: no logical < 3 exists

Diagnostics

computed by the verifier from the parity checks, the layout, and the stored witnesses; shown as evidence, not used for ranking
girth H_X 4 · H_Z 4 (shortest cycle of each side’s Tanner graph; longer is friendlier to belief propagation)
check weights H_X 8–23 (mean 13.625) · H_Z 8–23 (mean 13.625)
qubit degrees H_X 1–4 (mean 2.37) · H_Z 1–4 (mean 2.37)
trapping sets H_X (1,1)×8 (2,1)×96 (3,0)×124 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_X
(1,1): 8 (1,2): 18 (1,3): 15 (1,4): 5 (2,1): 96 (2,2): 208 (2,3): 245 (2,4): 120 (3,0): 124 (3,1): 976 (3,2): 2295 (3,3): 2733 (3,4): 2060 (3,5): 1140 (3,6): 370
trapping sets H_Z (1,1)×8 (2,1)×96 (3,0)×124 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_Z
(1,1): 8 (1,2): 18 (1,3): 15 (1,4): 5 (2,1): 96 (2,2): 208 (2,3): 245 (2,4): 120 (3,0): 124 (3,1): 976 (3,2): 2295 (3,3): 2733 (3,4): 2060 (3,5): 1140 (3,6): 370
witness diameter X 5.099 · Z 2.0 (Euclidean support diameter of the stored distance witnesses in the layout; an upper bound on the exhibited logicals’ spread, not a minimum over all logicals)

Circuit tier

syndrome-extraction memory circuits committed under circuits/46-30-3/ · canonical noise recipe, 3 rounds, stim 1.16.0
d_circ ≤ 3 (min over bases; penalty-only, clamped to ≤ d)
d_circ^X 3 · fault-set witness of 3 mechanisms (claimed upper_bound)
witness fault set (mechanism indices in the committed .dem, 3)
[210, 221, 415]
d_circ^Z 3 · fault-set witness of 3 mechanisms (claimed upper_bound)
witness fault set (mechanism indices in the committed .dem, 3)
[3265, 3356, 3361]
no measured logical error rate yet; d_circ is a floor, and the measured tier records the prefactor it cannot see

Verified 2D layout

as measured by the verifier: every check drawn over the submitted coordinates; the interaction radius is the longest dashed pair
layout contributed by @vprusso · Inherited from the laid-out parent codes/48-30-4.json: the parent's coordinates with the entries of the removed qubits (parent indices 0, 7) dropped, since this peel chain keeps the parent's qubit order. Radius, layer count, and class re-measured by the verifier. · 2026-11-04
r = 5.385
X checkZ checkqubit site (24)2 qubits stacked (2 layers)dashed: the pair setting the interaction radiushover a check to isolate its qubits; click to pin — repeated clicks cycle through overlapping checks; click empty space to release
routing cost 23 nearest-neighbor SWAPs per round in total, at most 3 for one check (heuristic: MST lower bound on the layout, with one lattice step = the minimum qubit spacing 1; not a rank)

Construction & provenance

authors @mathysrennela
provenance submitted through the challenge
novelty novelty not audited
construction priced calculus E-PEEL transform of codes/48-30-4.json
model Beam 1.0 (claimed, not verified)
date 2026-11-01
family other (a tag, not a ranking)
locality 2D-local bilayer (computed from the layout)
weight class weight > 8 (computed)

How this code was found

the research note submitted with this code · raw markdown · all notes

[[46,30,3]] — priced calculus E-PEEL transform of 48-30-4.json

Direction & hypothesis

Weight-23 unrestricted CSS cell. Transform a connected CSS parent (48-30-4.json, a board entry) with the priced construction calculus to obtain a connected child that is not dominated by any existing entry in its track cell.

What was searched

Single-step and depth-2 deletion (C-DELETE-CHECK), peel (E-PEEL), and puncture (E-PUNCTURE) moves enumerated with machine.planner.plan from github.com/MathysRennela/code-calculus-dev. Parent: codes/48-30-4.json. Rule used for this survivor: E-PEEL. Connected children only; bare-qubit children and dominated candidates dropped. Witness search at 1000 RIS trials per side (research/kit/surrogate.lightest_logical, seeds 0/1), then verify/validate_candidate.py with full refutation.

Evidence trail

The submitted distance is a witness-backed upper bound: d = min(d_X, d_Z) with explicit X and Z logical witnesses carried in the JSON. The gate's random-seed refutation found no lighter logical. Parent entry: codes/48-30-4.json.

Dead ends

Other single-step moves from the same parents were discarded as disconnected, bare-qubit children, dominated candidates, or refuted by the gate.

Tools

Model: Beam 1.0. Harness: research/kit (coordination, submit, prescreen), code-calculus consumer. Approx compute: CPU only.

Reproduction

Rebuild H_X/H_Z from codes/48-30-4.json by applying the E-PEEL move of the priced calculus as recorded above; re-run the witness search at the stated budget.

Parity checks

X-checks 8 (max weight 23) · Z-checks 8 (max weight 23)
H_X (8 checks, sparse supports)
[6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13] [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21] [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29] [30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37] [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45] [0, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 35, 38, 39, 42, 43] [1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44] [2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 14, 17, 19, 20, 22, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 35, 36, 38, 41, 43, 44]
H_Z (8 checks, sparse supports)
[6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13] [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21] [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29] [30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37] [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45] [0, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, 13, 15, 18, 19, 21, 23, 26, 27, 29, 31, 34, 35, 37, 39, 42, 43, 45] [1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 36, 37, 40, 42, 44, 45] [2, 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28, 29, 33, 35, 36, 37, 41, 43, 44, 45]
Code ID 46-30-3 · download JSON · raw on GitHub